I found two in support of McCain, at least in the past week and a half:
http://alegrescorner.soapblox.net/showDi ary.do?diaryId=297 About how women over 65 previously supported Democrats, but now they're supporting McCain. This is because they intuitively know that they can trust McCain.
http://alegrescorner.soapblox.net/showDi ary.do?diaryId=246 This one is much more straightforward. In a contest between Obama and McCain, McCain is the only viable choice. This one was actually frontpaged by site admins.
Anna Shane is either lying or doesn't know about her own website.
She's not lying as we would think of it.
If you study abhorant brain patterns, they actually can look at something RED and think it's blue.
She actually THINKS they are all about celebrating Hillary and womens issue, but, as you say, 90% of it is smearing Obama.
And, think about this?
This statement is the LITERAL defination of cognotive dissonace:
"I am a feminist, and because of the sexist treatment Hillary Clinton recieved, I am going to vote for the party that literally has codified women as second class citizens in their platform for 3 decades"
This is like "My mom died of lung cancer from smoking, so I am sending the money she left me to the tabacco defense fund"
the first link you put up is not pro-McLame at all, it does discuss a POLL that seems to show that result but it does not glorify McSame and in fact goes on to say how he is "coy" about how he would "fix" SS and talks about Obama's actual plan for it.
The 2nd one is more anti-BHO then pro-John although the difference is not enough to say your characterization is wrong.
But it does show that you are not really reading the diaries before you post links, just the headlines.
