Display:


That's not really the point (none / 0)

Or not the only point anyway. The point is that the WSJ is desperate to spin this as somehow positive for McCain, even ignoring the vast majority of the data in their own poll. Notice how the article text focuses on the drilling argument that wasn't even part of the poll they used to support the article. Obviously they are hoping people won't click on the poll data link.

Additionally, if we believe the WSJ polls are likely to be biased towards conservatives, what does it say when their own poll shows Obama beating McCain by nearly every possible metric?


by Phil In Denver on Fri Jul 25, 2008 at 06:01:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: That's not really the point (none / 0)

You are right here. When I read the article I had to search to find who was actually in the lead. They led with some subsidiary data which looked better for McCain.


by ottovbvs on Fri Jul 25, 2008 at 08:51:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]