Well, let's just try to avoid the debacle of 1924, nine days, 103 ballots and a loser nominee:

Democrats weary of this year's comparatively drawn-out presidential nominating process might take comfort in recalling the marathon Democratic National Convention of 1924, at more than two weeks the longest in American history.

Two strong candidates - former Treasury Secretary William McAdoo and New York Gov. Al Smith - arrived at New York's Madison Square Garden matched neck-and-neck.

In those days, the party required a two-thirds vote to gain the presidential nomination, so the delegates plodded through 103 ballots before nominating Wall Street lawyer John W. Davis, who went on to be crushed in the general election by incumbent President Coolidge.

At one point in the ordeal, a Massachusetts delegate reportedly suggested that "we must either switch to another candidate or find a cheaper hotel."

Austin American-Statesman 11 May 2008

I don't think too many people are agitating that her name should be placed in the roll call for the nomination.

I don't really know the purpose that serves .

Normally when a candidate is past the point of endorsing another candidate, that candidate's name is NOT placed in nomination.  

The nomination process at the convention involves active candidates, not ones who are working on behalf of another candidate.

But of course any delegate could still choose to vote for any one they wish.  And that happens at every convention; usually it's votes for one's state's governor, a beloved family member, or a primary candidate.

signature, not the nominee's signature.